Mari’s Blog

A new publication and a filing drawer “find”

During Henry’s spring break, he and I went on a trip to California during which I signed a contract to publish A Course of Love in one single, combined volume. I’m really excited about it.

I know…it probably seems a little funny that I haven’t mentioned it before now. What kind of excitement is that, right? Well, for one thing, we’re going to launch a new website/blog and for another, with a Fall 2014 publication date, I’ve been pretty busy. We’ve checked and double-checked the manuscripts (Word files and originals) and a new cover has been designed, and everything but The Dialogues has even been typeset already. But there’s sort of this feeling, I guess, of it not being quite yet the time to introduce the folks making all of this happen or the new publication itself. It’s still a “preparatory” time.

As part of my preparation I started cleaning my sun room office. There’s a certain energy to new projects—at least for me. My deadly time is at the end. When I’m done—I’m done and I rarely look back. That’s why things like my file drawer are a mess and why I went down in the basement for an empty box, intent on filling it with the drawer’s contents and delivering all that paper into the hands of the recycler. I took everything out of that file drawer … but … by the time I was through reading and sorting, I only had about three pieces of paper in my hand for the waste basket and I started reading one of those.

My “find” of the day is this sheet of paper full of my handwriting, written in pencil on the back of page showing visual images of rotator cuff rehabilitation exercises, which tells me just how much I used that list and about how long ago it was that I wrote across its back (nearly four years)!

It’s a “find” because when you’re talking a new publication you’re asked questions like, “What is the essence of this Course of Love?” You feel like you ought to be able to easily answer such questions. And yet, if you’ve ever tried to describe A Course of Love to someone who hasn’t heard of it, you might have run into this same problem. What do you say? It speaks to the heart?

I seemed to be asking myself the same “What is it?” question when I jotted these notes four years ago. I thought I’d share them with you. (I’ll share more details on the new publishing venture soon.)

This Course begins with prayer—felt like prayer, came from prayer—the answer to prayer.

What does it draw us to?

Interior transformation and exterior manifestation
Expanding vision
Deepening compassion
Listening to God and the promptings of our hearts and listening to people and the cries of their hearts.

Prayer or being with God in deep and receptive relationship—sometimes active/sometimes in silence
Union with Christ and our brothers and sisters

Solidarity with others on the journey – whatever their way.

Heart energy – the love – grows our commitment and respect for the rights of people – for justice, generosity, caring

Way of great humility and ordinary leadership – of becoming mature human beings

Intimacy, fellowship, autonomy, community, dialogue, realness, authenticity

Creativity, spaciousness – out of the feeling of stuckness, being trapped in our lives

More movement than leaps. A best of times/worst of times feel.

I’d be very unlikely to say much of the same thing or use many of the same words now, but they’re all good, original words, the kind that come when you’re at ease and not in need of them for any particular reason. The kind that come from that heart place from which A Course of Love would have all of our offerings arise, the place of no effort and very little “thinking”.

Laughing…at myself.

My new grandson Jack was baptized on Sunday and regardless of how lovely it was (and it was lovely), I’m afraid I’ll remember it as the baptism during which my slip was showing.

My daughter Mia, Jack’s mom, wanted a certain “look” for the baptism. She wanted family pictures afterward. She didn’t want any black. She was remembering the baptism of my only other grandchild, Henry, which happened on Easter 2007. She remembered the white shirt my husband Donny wore, and asked me to get it ready for him (knowing he hasn’t exactly been out buying new dress shirts). She knew I’d worn a white suit and frowned at the gray pants, white shirt and black jacket I’d originally intended.

I got out Donny’s old white shirt and my old white suit. Neither of us were going to wear those, if for different reasons. We found another acceptable shirt for him and I bought a dress. A pink dress. A hot-pink sleeveless dress that somehow looked great on me. It had this sassy, sort of flouncy skirt and, even though I was pretty sure I’d return it, it was so cheap on sale that I thought later, ‘Even if I don’t wear it for the baptism, when will I ever again find a dress that fits me like this?’ It was something about the fit.

I eventually decided to pair the pink dress with a white linen, three-quarter sleeve blazer that got passed on to me from my other daughter, Angela, and that I realized was what she’d worn for Henry’s big event. Sounded great. But I’ve never had the kind of legs that can go without hose and it being early April with snow still on the ground here in Minnesota, my legs are so white as to make the hose an absolute necessity. I had to go buy a pair—that’s how long it has been since I’ve worn a dress. I’m not kidding. I didn’t even know where to look for them in my local Target.

Unfortunately, after getting ready, the dress was clinging to the hose and I had to hunt down a slip. Now, I’m quite certain I haven’t worn a slip since my job at the University of Minnesota, but I still had one. It was black, but the dress wasn’t sheer or anything, so I thought it would be fine.

What I hadn’t accounted for was that I’m thinner than I was in my U of M days. As I carried the gifts to the altar in my pink dress, my black slip—well—slipped and slipped until it was hanging well beneath the edge of my dress. I realized it about then and hitched it up as well as I could when I got back to my pew and thought it would stay that way for some odd reason. That’s how I came to have pictures taken with my slip showing. One of my friends told me her husband said “It’s a good look.” My sister said, “I thought at first it was part of the dress. Black and pink go together.” My mom was strangely silent.

My sister, me, and baby Jack. This was the only size picture that would show the whole of my dress (and the wandering slip).

That was yesterday. I’ve been wondering since then if it was a sign…like who am I kidding? What am I doing wearing a dress again? When I got home and put on my black sweat pants and my gray turtleneck (it had cooled down from a stunningly beautiful, sunny, high-50’s afternoon), I caught site of myself in the mirror and shook my head. Now I looked “like me” and comfortable, and I thought of my friends who had come in their slacks, looking like “themselves”, and my counter-part, Jack’s other grandma, who looked very nice in a simple but decorative white shirt worn with, I’m pretty sure, a pair of jeans.

Was it one of those moments that say, “Just be who you are, be who you are, be who you are?” I actually think it was, even though I intend to wear the dress again—at least when it’s 80 degrees and humid and I need something that looks nice—but maybe not only then. I bought the dress not only for Mia’s desire to have a certain kind of picture, but because it pleased me. I can’t tell you how long it’s been since something hot-pink, or with a flouncy skirt did that. I felt light and sprightly in it (especially after I took off the slip). I have that side too and I may want to honor it on occasion.

The baptismal reading was from the Gospel of John (11:1-43) that speaks of Jesus raising Lazarus from the dead. It’s the one that has the famous three word sentence, the shortest in the New Testament, the one that says, “And Jesus wept.”

Sitting next to me was my mom, whose brother Lewis just died, and two rows back, my friend Susan whose mother passed three weeks ago. And being held in the pew before me was the not-quite five-month-old Jack being ceremoniously initiated into new life. It all made a lovely sort of cyclical sense.

Lazarus (and Baptism for that matter) are a sign of what Jesus would do for all humanity—have us resurrect in life. I could go on and on talking about that, but I’ll end as I began with a pink dress and a slip-sliding slip, noting that if we’re resurrected “within” life we will still be wearing clothes.

Jesus called Lazarus out of the tomb. He was bound hand and foot by his burial cloth. Jesus said, “Loose him; let him go.” New life is like that. Like being unbound. The liberation of being loosed of bounds means I quit pigeon-holing myself—even into thinking I’m too liberated to ever stick myself in a dress again, or too old (or mature or spiritual…or what have you) to flounce, or to laugh…at myself.

Distractions

Ah…a moment’s silence. It happened while I was back in the cabin’s corner plugging in the phone to charge. Turning from that chore, it was suddenly there. The hush. It’s still relatively quiet. Furnace is off.

Donny must leave early today and of course…I forgot the phone. Two trips now over the ice, so he can call me in when he’s ready. Grateful for Dad’s cane. Realizing what we do to preserve ourselves…naturally, without thought almost. Realizing the sky is different going out than going in, north and south, the direction in which I move. Realizing a few minutes bring change: first time out a brief hint of clouds and nothing else to be seen. Second time the clouds have passed. Stars are peeping like chicks.

The morning birds have not arrived. It is a little past six and solidly dark at the mid-point of earth and sky that I watch. The fence is visible only with an adjustment of the eyes, having blended in with the morning’s night sky. I watch it anyway. I watch the stillness. I watch the fence become visible.

I am witness to the fence. I am audience to the woods. And they to me.

Where is your center? In the silence? In the dance? Carving wood? Cooking? In the presence of a child? Where you are without distractions? Isn’t that it?

For some of life, distractions become the show. The whole show. There is nothing else.
Distractions are life’s commercials.

What am I still distracted by? What am I distracted from?

The show is now forming over the fence, two pale blue lines appearing beneath the dark sky taking on the hue of blue.

(I have been absent for a while. Blogs are at times distractions and, at other times, not.)

Interviews

If you were to interview someone, who would it be? What questions would you ask? If you were to be interviewed, what questions would you want to be asked?

My friend Mary has been telling me for years and years that there’s an expansion that happens with different forms of media.

If you’re a book lover, like me, reading feels like the ultimate experience. Who needs anything else! If you’re a writer, you think writing is the ultimate way.  Why do anything else? I wasn’t terrifically interested.

Mary was trying to open my eyes to the possibilities.  She’d tell me how when she heard a writer give an interview, she knew another dimension of that person. A person’s voice was another “dimension.” Seeing the person “live” via video on YouTube or something like a TED talk, added another dimension  – that of sight. The more each of these dimensions were available, the more her senses were given the chance to “take in” the person, and the more she felt she knew them.  Even a picture is always nice, she’d say.

I could agree – about other people.  She was right.  I liked seeing a picture on a book jacket. I always read the blurbs about the author. I wasn’t much of an audio/visual person, but when I’d happen to hear or see an author, I did like it.  If I got really enamored by someone’s work, I’d occasionally go on-line to read more about them and if I found a short audio or video, I felt “lucky” to get to hear or see them. I knew what she meant. I did get a fuller picture. But I didn’t think it was for me.

Yet I began to feel an urge, about a year ago, to do interviews. I’ve met so many fascinating people over the years. Lots of these “meetings” were taking place via email and after a while I’d long for something more and I was really intrigued by the idea of turning the tables. What does the reader of a book like A Course of Love have to say about the experience?  I’d still like to try out this idea. But did I have an urge to “be” interviewed? To have someone ask me questions that I’d have to come up with answers to off the top of my head, (so to speak), live, in the moment, under pressure?  Not really.

It’s been interesting to have a couple of interviews under my belt now, to see how different each one is, how different people have dissimilar questions, how their questions are prompts that help me discover a spontaneous expression.  How seldom I have to “go to my head” and how I can answer from the heart.  I spoke of this quality of difference that is found in relationship during a recent radio show on ACIM Gather.  It was the first time someone from the listening audience posted a question “to the board.” That question made the rest of the hour feel so much more personal. I was grateful for it and it was a really lovely shift into a more communal feeling zone. Finally, here is a portion of a “live” interview I just posted on YouTube (short and sweet, only 6 minutes).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GpvboEmaKU

 

 

 

 

Essay: Starting at the Beginning

Entering a new experience through “A Course of Love”

The whole secret to anything is found in letting it speak to you in a new way, in finding your capacity to take things in as they are.  Listening to music is a good example…as is a certain kind of reading, writing, or creating. Toni Morrison said:

“I know now, more than I ever did (and I always on some level knew it), that I need that intimate, sustained surrender to the company of my own mind while it touches another’s—which is reading. … That I need to offer the fruits of my own imaginative intelligence to another without fear of anything more deadly than disdain – which is writing.”

I would like to take that idea of “intimate sustained surrender” and ask if it is something we can even begin to approach with our analytical minds. The whole secret to anything is letting it speak to you…listening in a receptive way…absorbing from within that intimacy where our minds or hearts are touched by another in such a way that distinctions between the human and the divine touch of truth fade.

Everything that comes of that “intimate sustained surrender” is very individual.  We enter into a relationship. There are two of us engaged in this activity and when we allow ourselves to be swept up into that other – that other world of reading or music or art, of relationship, or of the sacred – we touch something beyond…far beyond what is touched when we’re focused on dissecting what is being said or heard, or focused on an instruction and its process, practice, or outcome.

The essential component of anything that has the capacity to touch us is in the manner of how it enters us.

This has some similarity to what is called Lectio Divina, Latin for divine reading, but only a little, and I’ll tell you what I think those connections are. One is intention toward communion with the living word. We can hear a phrase like the “living word” all our lives and never get a feel for what it means until we encounter something that feels like the living word to us.  It’s as though the living word jumps off the page and enters us.  It could come from anywhere – a poem, an economist, scriptural reading. The focus then, of this living word, isn’t analysis or instruction but that it has entered us.

On Wikipedia (under Lectio Divina) this example is used.  It’s from Jesus’ statement in John 14:27: “Peace I leave with you; my peace I give unto you.”  An analytical approach would focus on the reason for the statement during the Last Supper, the biblical context and so on.  But in Lectio Divina, rather than “dissecting peace,” there is an entering of peace.”

This is fairly easy when the living word is given in a rather poetic way.  No matter what our intention at such times, we could swoon for feelings that arise in us.

“A door has been reached, a threshold crossed.  What your mind still would deny your heart cannot.  A tiny glimmering of memory has returned to you and will not leave you to the chaos you seem to prefer.  It will keep calling you to acknowledge it and let it grow.  It will tug at your heart in the most gentle of ways.  Its whisper will be heard within your thoughts.  Its melody will play within your mind.  “Come back, come back,” it will say to you.  “Come home, come home,” it will sing.  You will know there is a place within yourself where you are missed and longed for and safe and loved.  A little peace has been made room for in the house of your insanity.” ACOL 11.32

Another way we might meet a more complicated text is in feeling an almost weighty sense of truth that we yet don’t understand.  We might feel as if we could ponder this living word the rest of our days without knowing why it spoke to us as it did – which you might think would be frustrating – but which, if your attitude is one of openness to being touched, moved, or dwelling with, can feel like a blessing.  This sort of blessing sends you into a state of simply “being with” that statement…and maybe gives you a feeling that it’s come to say something to you, even if you don’t know what…or a sense that it will accompany you through your life, so that even if you might feel some frustration in your contemplation, it wouldn’t stop you.

“Must pain accompany love and loss? Is this the price you pay, you ask, for opening up your heart? And yet, should you be asked if you would have other than the love you would not answer yes. What else is worth such cost, such suffering, so many tears? What else would you not let go when pain comes near, as a hand would drop a burning ember?  What other pain would you hold closely, a grief not to be given up?  What other pain would you be so unwilling to sacrifice? ACOL 3.13

“Think not that these are senseless questions, made to bring love and pain together and there to leave you unaided and unhelped, for pain and love kept together in this way makes no sense, and yet makes the greatest sense of all.”  ACOL 3.21

There’s a further element of sacred reading as it relates to “A Course of Love.”  The foundation of Lectio Divina came from Origen who referred to Christ as the Word of God.  In his view, Christ was the interpretive key that would unlock the message in scriptural texts.

Lectio Divina was later formalized into a four step process and I won’t get into that but just stick with the manner in which we take in whatever it is we read…as it seems that formal processes have the ability to get us caught up in the process to the extent that we forget that the process isn’t the end point.

Where we start in “A Course of Love” (ACOL) is with a shifting from the ego self to the Christ in us. It is the Christ in us, the living word, that will be relating to what is given in the messages … if we can allow it. Even if we don’t know what this means, or don’t feel particularly allowing, the idea of it, presented in ACOL’s first pages – the idea that this shift will happen – can do something to us.

The living word doesn’t only apply to the sacred as such.  Maybe you’ve heard of the living word in terms of a national document. The United States Constitution is described as a living document.  When that is said, it means the opposite to its interpretation – as by Supreme Court Justice Scalia – as “the words on paper.”  It means the spirit of those words that continue to live and change as people and history move forward. This is important because if we don’t see our national constitutions or scripture in this dynamic way, it might still be legal to own human beings – slaves, or women. In the Bible, particularly the Old Testament, “the words on paper” taken literally, might instill the idea of vengeance as not only the way God operated, but as quite allowable in human beings.  So living words mean a lot more than being revisionist.

Beyond that are the feelings evoked by our living words.  Words like liberty or soul are more than dead words – they become part of us – they can even become us.  This means that they are “living organisms,” and that their “meanings are dynamic,” as Peter Ludlow, a professor of philosophy at Northwestern wrote.

This kind of reading of the living word is an experience. We enter into it. This is the modus operandi by which “A Course of Love” takes up the call to the new human; a human capable of transcending the ego and creating a new world.

Here are some ways entering is spoken of within this scribed series of books (A Course of Love, The Treatises of A Course of Love, and The Dialogues of A Course of Love) presented as a new course in miracles.

“These words enter you as what they are, not the symbols that they represent.”

“Be aware of your heart, for this is where this learning enters and will stay.”

There is offered a means to enter into union (a state we cannot be taught to access), to enter into holy and personal relationship, and to recognize that each feeling requires us to enter into a relationship with it. Approaching these messages in a new way, we enter a time of non-learning, we enter Christ consciousness, we allow revelations to enter our awareness, we enter a new time.

One such aspect that is a forerunner of this new time, is called the time of tenderness:

“Where you learned to hate, you will learn to love.  Where you learned to fear, you will learn safety.  Where you learned to distrust, you will learn trust.  And each learning experience will be a learning experience because it will touch your heart.  It may be as simple as a smile from a child that melts away all the resentment you held from your childhood — because you allow that smile to touch your heart.  It may be a time of weepiness and what you would term emotionalism.  You may feel as if everything makes you want to cry because everything will touch you, each lesson will feel tender.  24.1

“The time to resist tenderness is over.  The time to resist the tears of weariness is over.  This is the time of the embrace. 24.2

“These feelings of tenderness can be seen as a sign.  Welcome them as harbingers of this good news.  Know that the time of tenderness is a sure path on the way home.” 24.3

Gordon Marino, writing for “The Stone,” a NYT forum for contemporary philosophers, says:

“If a primary aim in life is to develop into a caring and connected human being (admittedly, a big “if”), rather than, say, thinking of oneself as a tourist collecting as many pleasant and fulfilling experiences as possible, then surely a capacity for tenderness must play a role.”

There doesn’t have to be a split between the caring and connected human and the goal of enlightenment or fulfilling experiences…but there often is.  “A Course of Love,” in taking us into our post-ego lives through the means of the whole and tender heart, creates a new hope for a future in which love, caring and connection through union and relationship – can become…not the goal…but the reality.

~Mari Perron

Toni Morrison is the author of many works of fiction. This quote is from a compilation of her non-fiction writings: “What Moves at the Margin.”

Gordon Marino is professor of philosophy and director of the Hong/Kierkegaard Library at St. Olaf College in Northfield, Minn.

 

Categories

Archives